The Korean Journal of Clinical Laboratory Science (KJCLS) is the official journal of the Korean Society for Clinical Laboratory Science. The ISO abbreviated title is “Korean J Clin Lab Sci”. The initial title was “the Korean Journal of Medical Technologists” (Volume 1, 1967∼ Volume 26, 1994). The title was later changed to “the Korean Journal of the Clinical Laboratory Science” (Volume 27, 1995∼ Volume 35, 2003, ISSN 1229-2850) and then to the current title “the Korean Journal of Clinical Laboratory Science” (Korean J Clin Lab Sci, Volume 36, 2004∼Present, pISSN 1738-3544, eISSN 2288-1662). KJCLS (http://www.kjcls.org/) is published by the Korean Society for Clinical Laboratory Science (https://www.kscls.or.kr/). In 2021, KJCLS (https:// www.kjcls.org/) was registered by the International Standard Name Identifier (ISNI 0000 0004 6406 3334).
1. Issue DateKJCLS is published on March 31, June 30, September 30, and December 31 every year. Supplement issues can be published if necessary.
2. Aims and ScopeThe Korean Journal of Clinical Laboratory Science (Korean J Clin Lab Sci; KJCLS) aims to establish high-quality standard testing methods in various medical environments, promote and support the advancement of outstanding laboratories, activate the expertise of laboratory scientists in the field of life sciences, and share various educational activities. The journal aims to pursue the professional values and ethical principles of science and to promote the exchange of ideas within the medical environment. It seeks to elevate the contributions and recognition of life sciences in improving global health. KJCLS focuses on scientific and original research in the field of clinical laboratory science, encompassing areas such as hematology, transfusionology, chemistry, immunology, microbiology, genetics, histology, cytology, cardiopulmonary physiology, neurophysiology, management, education, life sciences, and health sciences. These fields of research relate to the causation of diseases, their diagnosis, and disease management. Moreover, the journal emphasizes applying various analytical metho dologies in clinical laboratory science, its development, evaluation, and management. Types of papers include original articles, case reports, reviews, and technical briefs.
3. Bibliographical Indexes and DatabasesThe Korean Journal of Clinical Laboratory Science is indexed in the Korea Citation Index (KCI) of the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) and in the DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journal) database.
4. Open Access and AccessibilityThe Korean Society for Clinical Laboratory Science operates an online website (http://www.kscls.or.kr/) and an online paper submission system (http://www.kjcls.org/submission/ Login.html). The Korean Journal of Clinical Laboratory Science declares that it is an Open Access journal, and papers can be searched for or printed for free. The journal provides JATS XML & CrossRef (DOI) for its papers online.
5. Copyright Usage AgreementResearch publication ethics adhere to the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) “Guidelines on Good Publication” (http://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines) and the “Good Publication Practice Guidelines for Medical Journals” by the Korean Council of Science Editors (2013, http://kamje.or.kr).
1. Research Involving Humans (Human and Human- derived Materials)Research involving humans (human and human-derived materials) should comply with the “Declaration of Helsinki: Medical Research Involving Human Subjects” (revised in 2013, https://www.wma.net/what-we-do/ medical-ethics/declaration-of-helsinki/) and the Korean law “Act on Bioethics and Safety” (https://www.law. go.kr/법령/생명윤리및안전에관한법률, 2021). Patient-related information such as names, hospital patient registration numbers, birthdates, etc., should be protected. As a principle, the ethical nature of human experimentation should be reviewed by an independent Institutional Review Board (IRB). If necessary, researchers should thoroughly explain to the patient or their guardian about the purpose, background, and methods of the research, as well as any potential mental or physical harm that may occur during the study. Obtaining a signed informed consent (written informed consent) is mandatory.
2. Research Involving AnimalsResearch involving animals must adhere to the basic guidelines for the management and use of experimental animals (Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals) established by the nation or institution. Additionally, it should comply with the Animal Protection Act (Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, 2022) and the Law on Experimental Animals (Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, 2023).
Any research involving animals should indicate whether there was approval from the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) and provide details about informed consent. If necessary, for research other than original articles, the approval status from the IRB or IACUC can be requested.
3. Research MisconductResearch misconduct refers to inappropriate actions taken during the design, execution, reporting, and presentation of research. This includes forgery, falsification, plagiarism, deletion, self-deception, duplicate submission, redundant publication, paper partitioning, inappropriate listing of authors, and others. Each of these is detailed below:
Clinical trial research should be registered in the Clinical Research Information Service (CRiS; https://cris.nih.go.kr) within the Disease Control Agency, or in the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform approved by the World Health Organization (https://www.who.int/clinicaltrials- registry-platform), or on the U.S. National Institutes of Health’s ClinicalTrial.gov (https://clinicaltrials.gov).
5. Data SharingThe Korean Journal of Clinical Laboratory Science adheres to the data-sharing policy recommendations of ICMJE (https://icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf). All manuscripts reporting clinical trial results must submit a data-sharing statement in accordance with ICMJE guidelines, and when necessary, provide a link for data sharing.
6. AuthorshipThe corresponding author should be the one directly communicating with the editorial board during manuscript submission, expert review, and publication process. This author should cooperate in providing author information, obtaining ethical committee approval, registering clinical trials, and gathering conflict of interest declarations, as required by the editorial board. After publication, they should also respond to comments on the paper and cooperate when the editorial board requests additional data or information related to the paper. All co-authors share responsibility for the content of the paper. Every researcher listed as an author must meet all four of the following criteria, as defined by ICMJE (http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/ roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html):
Only those who meet all the above conditions can be considered authors. The affiliation and author information (position) should be accurately specified in the published paper to enhance research credibility. Researchers who do not meet the four criteria can be listed in the Acknowledgments section as contributors. Any changes in authorship (additions, deletions, order changes, etc.) after manuscript submission must be explained in writing or by email to the editor. All authors must sign this and must also complete the copyright transfer.
7. Declaration of InterestsA conflict of interest arises when authors (or their institutions), reviewers, or editors have financial or personal relationships that might influence their actions during the manuscript writing, reviewing, and publication process. All authors must declare 1) financial relationships (employment, consultancy, stock ownership), 2) personal relationships, 3) academic competition, and 4) intellectual interests.
8. Original Experimental Data and Ethical DocumentsThe editorial board does its utmost to uphold publication ethics and integrity by maintaining the truthfulness of content, excluding commercial demands, editing or retracting publications, and screening for plagiarism and fabricated data. Submitted papers are checked through Copykiller, KCI similarity, and Turnitin. If the value is high, they meticulously examine the possibility of duplicated publication or plagiarism. The editor is involved in deciding on the publication of the submitted paper, scrutinizes any conflicts of interest, requests corrections for errors, recommends retraction in case of serious violations, and ensures the anonymity of reviewers, among other responsibilities.
The paper should be written in Korean or English.
2. TypeTypes of papers include Original articles, Case reports, Review articles, and Technical notes.
3. Qualification for SubmissionManuscripts should be written in accordance with the “Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals (https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/, International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, 2023).”
1. CompositionSpecies | Gene, mRNA, cDNA | Protein |
---|---|---|
Human, Monkey, Chicken, Livestock |
Italic, Uppercase (e.g.) AFP, IGF1, APOE gene expression (e.g.) BCR-ABL mutations, HER2 gene |
Regular font, Uppercase (e.g.) AFP, IGF1, APOE protein levels (e.g.) BCR-ABL kinase domain, HER2-positive |
Mouse, Rat | Italicized, Initial capital letter (e.g.) Gfap |
Regular font, Uppercase (e.g.) GFAP |
Bacteria | Italicized, lowercase (e.g.) rpo |
Regular font, first letter capitalized (e.g.) RpoB |
Clinical department | Clinical Laboratory, Clinical Pathology Laboratory, Clinical Pathology Team, Medical Laboratory, Laboratory Medicine Team, Pathology Laboratory, Pathology Team, Nuclear Medicine Laboratory, Nuclear Medicine Team |
---|---|
Clinical department, Multidisciplinary care center | Physiological Function Laboratory, Physiology Team, Physiological Function Laboratory, Special Laboratory Team, Cardiology Laboratory, Pulmonology Laboratory, Gastroenterology Laboratory, Neurology Laboratory, Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring, Neurocongnitive Laboratory, Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, Extracorporeal Circulation, Ophthalmic Optometry Laboratory, Otorhinolaryngology Laboratory |
Clinical support department | Transfusion Management Office, Infection Control Office |
Referral laboratories | Molecular Diagnostics Team |
Biomedical research institute | Research and Experiment Team |
Public health center | Clinical Pathology Laboratory |
Health and environment research institute | Microbiology Team |
교수 | Professor |
---|---|
외래교수 (한국대학교육협의회 <대학교육> 114호> 별칭교수 유형: 외래, 겸임, 연구, 강의, 산학, 임상, 초빙, 명예, 객원, 석좌, 기금, 특임, 계약, 대우, 교환교수 등) | Adjunct professor |
강사 | Lecturer |
연구위원, 연구원, 박사후연구원 | Researcher |
대학원생(석사과정생, 박사과정생, 석박사통합과정생) | Graduate student |
학부생 | Undergraduate student |
초중등학교 소속 교사 | Teacher |
초중등학교 소속 학생 | Student |
임상병리사 | Clinical laboratory technologist |
직장 소속 일반인 | President, C-level officer, Director, Manager, Associate |
소속과 직위가 없는 경우 | OOO (name) |
For citing references in the main text, the “National Library of Medicine Recommended Formats 2nd Edition (Recommended Format 2nd Edition [https://www.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov/books/NBK7256/, National Library of Medicine, 2007])” should be used.
For the format of references, adhere to the “National Library of Medicine Recommended Formats 2nd Edition (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK7256/, National Library of Medicine, 2007)”.
Titles and contents of tables should be written in English. Exceptions can be made when the content of the table is unavoidably in Korean.
The combined total of tables and figures should not exceed 10. Exceptions can be made in unavoidable circumstances.
Titles of tables and figures should be written in sentence or section format. Except for the first letter, proper nouns,
abbreviations, or other necessary capitalizations, all should be in lowercase. Table titles should be placed at the top without a period,
while figure titles should be placed at the bottom with a period.
When referencing tables or figures in the text, they should follow the order they’re cited, e.g., Table 1, Figure 2, Figure 3A, Figure 3B.
(e.g.) (Table 1), (Tables 1, 2), (Tables 1–3), (Figure 1), (Figure 1A, 1B), (Figures 1–3), (Table 1, Figure 2)
This aims to contribute to the qualitative improvement of the Korean Journal of Clinical Laboratory Science by establishing matters related to the review of papers submitted.
Article 2 (Composition)Submitted papers are evaluated by both the editorial and review committees. The editorial committee pre-assesses the content and quality of submitted papers before sending them for review. If the content of a paper does not align with the journal’s objectives and scope or is not written according to the submission guidelines, it can be rejected without review.
Table 1. Write the review evaluation from the perspectives listed in Table 1 below.
Outstanding (5) | Excellent (4) | Average (3) | Insufficient (2) | Lacking (1) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Theoretical contribution (main points of academic relevance and review results) | |||||
2. Practical implications | |||||
3. Originality of the content | |||||
4. Theoretical and experimental verification and validity | |||||
5. Appropriateness of research motivation and background | |||||
6. Description and logic of the objective | |||||
7. Appropriateness of research method | |||||
8. Validity of the title in both Korean and English | |||||
9. Validity of the title and summary (including abstract) | |||||
10. Citation rate of recent references | |||||
11. Appropriateness of the writing style in accordance with paper submission guidelines. | |||||
Total Score / 50 | |||||
※ A Accept (Suitable for Publication): 46∼50 / Minor (Publish after Revision): 41∼45 / Major (Re-evaluate after Revision): 31∼40 / Reject (Not Suitable for Publication): 30 and below. |
Table 2. The items to be checked are as follows.
Excellent (5) | Average (3) | Insufficient (1) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Is the focus of the paper’s title clearly set? | |||||
2. Are the research questions the paper aims to address specifically presented? | |||||
3. Is the research question a significantly meaningful topic in its field? | |||||
4. Is the research topic also very meaningful in both the theoretical and practical aspects of the field? | |||||
5. Has the review of prior studies necessary for researching the set research questions been carried out very systematically? | |||||
6. Does it encompass all the content necessary to solve the research problem? | |||||
7. Were literature analysis and survey research conducted concurrently to solve the research problem? | |||||
8. Has the result analysis through the distinction of experimental and control groups been carried out very scientifically? | |||||
9. Are the research conclusions and suggestions based on the analysis results? | |||||
10. Were the analysis results systematically derived for their significance and implications? | |||||
11. Has the bibliography been organized accurately? | |||||
Total Score / 50 | |||||
※ Accept (Suitable for Publication): 46~50 / Minor (Publish after Revision): 41~25 / Major (Re-evaluate after Revision): 31~40 / Reject (Not Suitable for Publication): 30 or below. | |||||
표1과 표2의 총점에 따라 최종 평가한다. | |||||
The final evaluation is based on the total scores of Table 1 and Table 2. | |||||
Total Score / 100 | |||||
※ Accept (Suitable for Publication): 90~100 / Minor (Publish after Revision): 80~89 / Major (Re-evaluate after Revision): 60~79 / Reject (Not Suitable for Publication): 59 or less. |
Reviewers assess the research based on its originality, the logical progression of its content, the validity of the analysis method, the appropriateness of the paper format, and the adequacy of research ethics, according to the evaluation form (mentioned in Article 4). However, for papers written at the request of the society, some of the review process can be omitted based on the editorial committee’s opinion. The evaluation form is like Table 1 and Table 2, and the results of the paper review are specified as the total score for each item. For papers written at the society’s request, parts of the review process can be omitted based on the editorial committee’s opinion.
Article 5 (Review Results)The editorial committee decides on publication based on the review results. Once the appointed editor completes the review of the paper, the chief editor refers to the third-party paper review comprehensive judgment form to make the final decision on whether to publish the paper. The third-party paper review comprehensive judgment form is as follows.
Article 7 (Post-Publication Decision Procedures):Number | Evaluation Results | Initial Review Decision | Re-review Decision | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Suitable for Publication | Publish after revision | Re-evaluate after Revision | Not Suitable for Publication | |||
1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Suitable for Publication | N |
2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | N | |
3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | Publish or Publish after Revision | N or Y |
4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||
5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | ||
6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | ||
7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ||
8 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | ||
9 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | ||
10 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | ||
11 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | Re-evaluate after Revision | Y |
12 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | Y | |
13 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | Y | |
14 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Y | |
15 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | Y | |
16 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | Y | |
17 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | Not Suitable for Publication | N |
18 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | N | |
19 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | N | |
20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | N |
This regulation will be implemented from the day it is approved by the board of directors of the association.